But if you want to achieve the best quality results when editing your RAW files, it’s extremely valuable. This is a good question, and the simple answer is, no you don’t need DxO PureRAW. I’m not worried about revealing excessive shadow noise. It also frees to use whatever adjustments I like when I come to process my images later. I don’t need to worry about creating too much noise in the shadows. With results like this I’m free to ignore the ISO setting. The sample on the right shows the improvement when processing the RAW file first using DxO PureRAW 2. The shadow slider was then increased to +100% to reveal any noise in the shadows. The image sample on the left shows the RAW file processed with default sharpening and noise reduction in Lightroom. Possibly the most noticeable improvement is how the software strips away noise from my micro four thirds RAW files as in this example. When I then process the DNG file in Lightroom, I achieve a much better result than starting with the RAW file in Lightroom. How serious these problems are, also varies between camera and lens combinations.īy pre-processing my RAW files using DxO PureRAW I can automatically produce a DNG file which fixes these problems. The noise reduction is crude and often leaves traces of noise which needs cleaning up. The sharpening tools are fiddly to achieve the best results and even then, don’t match many competitors. The optical corrections usually leave me needing to do more work. Whilst I like working in the Lightroom Develop module to edit RAW files, the quality of the results isn’t always great. Why PureRAW 2 is THE ESSENTIAL Lightroom Accessoryīut let me explain why I think PureRAW 2 is the essential Lightroom accessory. Instead, it simply works and doesn’t require a great deal of thought. It isn’t intrusive and doesn’t overcomplicate the workflow. What I really like about DxO PureRAW 2 is how well it integrates with my computer operating system and Lightroom.
0 kommentar(er)
